Why Are Immigrants Flooding IRCC with Calls, Webforms, and Information Requests? A Transparency Crisis
Share
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is facing a growing crisis—not just of volume, but of trust. From overwhelmed customer service lines to an explosion in Access to Information (ATI) requests and the increasing involvement of Members of Parliament (MPs) in resolving immigration issues, the trend is clear: Canadians and applicants alike are desperate for clarity. But this isn’t just about backlogs or delays. It’s about a deeper, structural problem—IRCC’s lack of transparency and opaque decision-making.
A System Struggling to Communicate
Let’s look at the numbers:
- IRCC receives tens of thousands of webform inquiries each month.
- In 2023-2024 alone, over 182,000 ATI requests were filed—more than half of all such requests across all federal departments.
- The IRCC call center receives millions of calls annually, often leaving people waiting for hours.
- MPs' constituency offices report that over 50% of the requests they receive relate to immigration issues.
These figures don’t lie. Canadians and immigration applicants aren’t just looking for updates—they’re trying to make sense of decisions that too often arrive with little to no explanation.
The Root of the Problem: Opaque Decisions
At the heart of this information overload lies a lack of transparency. Many immigration applicants receive decisions that are template-based, vague, and devoid of meaningful reasoning. Rejections for visas or permanent residence often include phrases like "you have not satisfied the officer that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay”—without specifying what evidence was considered, or how the officer reached that conclusion.
These template decisions leave applicants confused, anxious, and unsure of what to do next. They turn to webforms, make calls, reach out to MPs, and, increasingly, file formal ATI requests just to see what the officer actually wrote in their Global Case Management System (GCMS) notes.
MPs and ATIP: The Backdoor to Transparency
Members of Parliament have effectively become the unofficial "ombudsmen" of the immigration system. Constituents contact them because it’s often the only way to get an update or to advocate for fairness. Meanwhile, the Access to Information process—originally meant to be a tool for transparency and accountability—has become a workaround that thousands now rely on to understand what went wrong in their file.
That more than 50% of all federal ATIP requests go to IRCC is not a sign of public engagement; it’s a symptom of dysfunction.
Conclusion: A System in Need of Reform
IRCC’s inefficiency is not just operational—it’s communicative. People aren’t frustrated merely because decisions take time; they’re frustrated because they don’t understand why those decisions were made. A well-functioning immigration system must be transparent, accountable, and communicative. At present, IRCC is falling short on all three counts.
To reduce the pressure on MPs, call centers, and the ATI system, IRCC must commit to issuing clear, individualized decisions and embracing transparency at every step of the application process. Until that happens, the flood of inquiries will only grow—because people will always seek answers, especially when the stakes are so high.